Employment for Employers

Leathes Prior’s Employment Team has long been regarded as one of the leading employment law teams in East Anglia and beyond, providing expert advice on all aspects of employment law.
Our Employment Team acts for businesses of all sizes across the UK, including a number of household name employers. The team prides itself on providing dynamic advice tailored to the specific requirements of the client, delivered promptly and in a straightforward manner. Getting good advice at the right time, and fast, can often mean an issue can be resolved quickly and simply.
Each employer is unique but the team’s decades of experience, technical expertise and commercial awareness ensures an exceptional service is provided. With an enviable track record in the Employment Tribunal over many years, the team represent clients fearlessly if litigation becomes necessary. Their expertise in all areas of contentious and non-contentious employment work includes:
Employment Disputes, Litigation and Tribunal Representation
Advocacy Services
The team frequently appear before the Employment Tribunal, Employment Appeals Tribunal and other courts representing their clients in the case the litigation becomes necessary.
Termination of Employment
Settlement Agreements
Discrimination, Bullying and Harassment
Contracts, Policies & Staff Handbooks
Disciplinary and Grievance Advice
Redundancies and Restructuring
Restrictive Covenants and Injunctions
Trade Union Recognition and Disputes
Mergers, Acquisitions and Disposals, and TUPE Advice
Advice on Multi-Jurisdictional Employment Status and Taxation Issues
Business Immigration and Visas
In-House Training and HR services
The Employment Team offers a full range of employment law in-house training sessions, tailored in every way to suit your individual business needs.
Employment Agencies and Business
Gangmasters Licensing Authority Regime
Legal Advice for Senior Executives
Health and Safety in the Workplace
Get in Touch
Reported Cases
Our Employment Team’s reported cases include:
Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment of Judge Auerbach on 28 February 2025.
Heard at: Watford Employment Tribunal by video (CVP)
On: 10 December 2024 and 11 December 2024
Before: Employment Judge Macey
Representation
Claimant: Mr Redpath, counsel
Respondent: Mr Chapman, solicitor
Held at: Manchester
On: 19 September 2017
Before: Employment Judge Sherratt
Representation
Claimant: Mr J Jenkins, Counsel
1st Respondent: Mr Chapman, Advocate
2nd Respondent: Ms J Hale, Solicitor
Heard at: London Central
On: 20 November 2017
Before: Regional Employment Judge Potter
Representation
Claimant: Ms E George, Counsel
Respondent: Mr D Chapman, Solicitor
Heard at: Norwich ET
On: 3rd & 4th July 2017
Before: Employment Judge Cassel
Respresentation
For the Claimant: Mr S Kemp, Husband of the Claimant
For the Respondent: Mr D Chapman, Solicitor
At the Tribunal
On 25 May 2011
Judgment handed down on 31 August 2011
At the Tribunal
On 12 August 2014
Handed down on 14 November 14
Heard at: Bury St Edmunds
On: 19 to 22 November 2018
Before: Employment Judge Finlay
Members: Mr R Allan and Mr V Brazkiewicz
Appearances
For the claimant: Mr D Chapman (Solicitor)
For the respondent: Mr M Foster (Solicitor)
Heard at: Nottingham Employment Tribunal (by remote CVP)
On: 21 and 22 July 2021
Before: Employment Judge K Welch (sitting alone)
Representation
Claimant: In Person
Respondent: Mr D Chapman, Solicitor
Employment Tribunal decision
Heard at: Bury St Edmunds Employment Tribunal
On: 25th September 2019
Before: Employment Judge King
Appearances
For the Claimant: Did not attend
For the Respondent: Mr D Chapman (solicitor)
The Claimant applied for interim relief pursuant to s.128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 following the termination of his contract allegedly because he had made protected disclosures. The Respondent contended that there was no entitlement to make such an application as the Claimant was not an "employee" within the meaning of that section. The Respondent's application for a postponement of the interim relief application pending a determination of the employee issue was refused. At the interim relief hearing, the Tribunal considered that the "likely to succeed" test under s.129 of the 1996 Act applied not just to the reason for dismissal but also to the contested issue of employee status. It determined that the Claimant had a 'pretty good chance' of success in showing that he was an employee and that he was dismissed for having made protected disclosures. The Respondent appealed on the grounds that the Tribunal erred in entertaining the application for interim relief before first concluding that the Claimant was indeed an employee.
Heard at: Manchester
On: 15 April 2019
Before: Employment Judge Franey (sitting alone)
Representation
Claimant: Mr D Flood, Counsel
Respondent: Mr D Chapman, Solicitor
Heard at: Manchester (remotely, by CVP)
On: 13 and 14 April 2021
Before: Employment Judge Whittaker(sitting alone)
Representation
Claimant: In person
Respondent: Mr Chapman, Solicitor
Norwich employer MASS Computers Ltd were today celebrating the successful conclusion of a complex Employment Tribunal case brought against it by a former employee, Mr Paul Dennis. Mr Dennis claimed constructive dismissal, breach of contract, unpaid wages and a breach of the flexible working regulations. After a two day hearing, followed by a third day to deal with the issue of costs, the Tribunal unanimously dismissed all of Mr Dennis's claims.
Hearing date: 4 October 2022
Representation
Appellant: Kevin McNerney (instructed by Leathes Prior Solicitors)
Third and Fourth Respondents: Stephen Butler
Employment Tribunal decision
.png)







































