Register of persons with significant control
As from 6 April 2016, legislation will come into effect which will make it compulsory for all non-listed UK companies, active or dormant, to create and maintain a register of persons with significant control (PSC).


As from 6 April 2016, legislation will come into effect which will make it compulsory for all non-listed UK companies, active or dormant, to create and maintain a register of persons with significant control (PSC). This needs to be kept with the other statutory registers of a company and to be available for inspection by the public. In order to comply with these new regulations, it will be necessary to take reasonable steps to identify PSC’s within the company and to have a register in place by the 6 April 2016. In order to be classified as a PSC, an individual or company must satisfy one or more of the following five conditions: If the PSC is a limited company incorporated within the EU, then details of that company must be recorded on the register.
- Directly or indirectly hold more than 25% of the shares,
- Directly or indirectly hold more than 25% of the voting rights,
- Directly or indirectly hold the right to appoint or remove a majority of directors,
- Otherwise have the right to exercise, or actually exercising, significant influence or control,
- Have the right to exercise, or actually exercising, significant influence or control over the activities of a trust or firm which is not a legal entity, but would itself satisfy any of the first four conditions if it were an individual.
If the PSC is a limited company incorporated outside the EU, then details of the individuals who have a significant interest in that company must be recorded on the register The PSC register must contain details of the company’s investigation into its PSC’s, the necessary particulars of any PSC’s and the nature of their control over the company. There is prescribed wording set out in the legislation that must be used; this wording varies dependent on the circumstances. From 30 June 2016 onwards, this information must be delivered annually to the central public register at Companies House when making a Confirmation Statement (which will replace Annual Returns as from 30 June 2016). Again, there is prescribed wording that must be used when filing the Confirmation Statement. Government Guidance has been issued regarding these obligations, including a summary of what information must be recorded and the prescribed wording that must be used. The Guidance can be accessed here. Non-compliance with the above is an offence for the company and its directors, punishable by a fine or up to two years imprisonment. If you require any further information regarding these obligations, please contact Paul Warman, Head of our Corporate Team.
.jpg)

Spring Statement 2026 - An Overview
With the Government having restricted itself to one fiscal event a year in the form of the Autumn Budget, the Spring Statement is perhaps not the dramatic moment it used to be. It is more a chance for the Government to respond to events and economic forecasts than to set policy for the future.



Charity of the Month: Sue Lambert Trust
Leathes Prior is delighted to be supporting the Sue Lambert Trust as our Charity of the Month for February 2026. Sue Lambert Trust is a leading charity in Norfolk offering free therapeutic counselling and support services to survivors of sexual violence and abuse.



Supreme Court ruling set to impact NHS - Children injured by NHS can claim damages for lifetime lost earnings
In February 2026, the Supreme Court passed a ruling which is set to significantly increase the amount of damages the NHS may have to pay for claims brought in respect of children injured at birth, as a result of medical negligence.

.jpg)

The Value of Planning Ahead: LPAs & Court of Protection
Putting LPAs in place allows you to choose trusted people to make decisions for you if you lose capacity in the future. This avoids the need for loved ones to make a costly and time-consuming deputyship application to the Court of Protection. With more people likely to experience conditions affecting capacity, more families may need to turn to the Court for support where no LPAs are in place.




















.jpg)











