Compensation for players under 24; a mystery?

As clubs begin their recruitment drive for next season, I am increasingly asked (whether in respect of players that we act for, clubs that we advise and work with or – mostly – out of idle curiosity) how the compensation system works.

No items found.

As clubs begin their recruitment drive for next season, I am increasingly asked (whether in respect of players that we act for, clubs that we advise and work with or – mostly – out of idle curiosity) how the compensation system works. Where a professional player, under the age of 24, has been offered a new contract by his club (subject to certain requirements that the offer must meet set out in Rule 64.3 of the Football League Rules) and he rejects that offer in order to take up the opportunity to sign for another club, compensation will be payable. This is not to be confused with training compensation under the EPPP regime (that applies to Academy players), an entirely different proposition.

In the majority of cases, clubs will reach mutual agreement on a compensation fee. However, in others the two clubs’ valuations will differ, sometimes significantly, and the matter will need to be settled through an arbitration process.

That process is operated by the Professional Football Compensation Committee (PFCC). The PFCC is incorporated under the rules of both The Football League and Premier League, and forms part of the collective bargaining agreement with the Professional Footballers’ Association. The PFCC comprises of an independent Chairman, appointees from The Football League and Premier League (as appropriate), an appointee of The Professional Footballers’ Association and an appointee of the League Managers’ Association.

PFCC hearings require each club to provide evidence to support their valuation of the player in question. In making its judgment the committee will take into account the costs of both clubs in operating a Football Academy or Centre of Excellence, as well as the age and playing record of the player, the length of time he was registered with his original club, the terms offered by both clubs, the status of the two clubs, the substantiated interest shown by other clubs in acquiring the registration of the player and any amounts paid by the original club to acquire the player in the first place.

Unlike FIFA’s formulaic approach which provides foreign clubs with a fixed tariff for compensation, this domestic process is said to provide the advantage of allowing greater flexibility in setting the level of compensation according to the merits of each individual case. The counter to that is that – unlike with the FIFA tariff – there is always inherent uncertainty, and this in my experience can work against players ; particularly lower down the Football League where clubs often feel that they can not afford to carry the risk of uncertainty. Or they may simply feel that the signing of a player governed by the PFCC regime is too complex.

In deciding on a compensation figure, it is not uncommon for the PFCC to set fees that build as the player becomes more established at first team level. It has now become quite usual for clubs to receive a basic compensation fee with further payments becoming due on the player’s debut, following a certain numbers of first-team appearances and after international appearances. It is also usual for there to be a sell-on fee should the player be sold at a profit at any point in the future.

Whilst the system is therefore uncertain, and it is difficult to advise a club or a player with firm precision as to what the likely level of compensation will be (and when acting for a player, this has to be a crucial factor in considering any new contract offer that has been made) I tend to use the following PFCC decisions as a framework (as they cover a good range of players in terms of their ability and status as at the point of the dispute). Even though each case will be different, in one’s submissions to the PFCC it would be perfectly proper to rely upon these precedents.

GEORGE PORTER

  • Porter had made 34 league appearances for Leyton Orient between the age of 18 and 20. He rejected a new two year contract offer, and instead signed a three year contract with the Championship club Burnley.
  • The PFCC decided that Burnley should pay Leyton Orient an initial compensation fee of £90,000.
  • Additionally, Burnley were to pay Leyton Orient a further £17,500 after the player has made 15, 30, 45 and 60 appearances (i.e. a total further potential payment of £70,000).
  • Burnley would also pay Leyton Orient a further sum of £100,000 if Burnley were promoted to the Premier League in the next three seasons and assuming the player remains at the club and had played at least 23 matches in the promotion season.
  • Leyton Orient should receive 16.5% of any profit made by Burnley in selling the player to another club at any point in the future.

AARON CRESWELL

  • Aaron Creswell had made 70 or so league appearances for Tranmere Rovers when, aged 21, he rejected a new long term contract offer. He signed for the Championship club Ipswich Town on a three year contract.
  • The PFCC decided that Ipswich Town should pay Tranmere Rovers an initial compensation fee of £240,000.
  • An additional £45,000 was ordered in respect of the player making 15, 30, 45 and 60 appearances for Ipswich Town.
  • An additional £100,000 was ordered should Ipswich Town achieve promotion to the Premier League in the next 3 seasons.
  • Tranmere Rovers are to receive 20% of any profit made by Ipswich Town in selling the player to another club at any point in the future.

ROBERT HALL

  • Robert Hall had signed a professional contract at West Ham aged 17, and made four first team league appearances for West Ham. He also enjoyed successful loan spells, including in particular at Birmingham City and represented England at under 16 through to under 19 level. Allowing his contract to expire, aged 20 he signed a three year contract at Bolton Wanderers.
  • The PFCC decided that Bolton should pay West Ham an initial compensation fee of £450,000.
  • Additionally, £250,000 will be due if Bolton are promoted to the Premier League in the next 3 seasons.
  • £2,500 per appearance was ordered for the first 100 appearances (for Bolton) in the Championship, or £10,000 per appearance for the first 100 appearances (for Bolton) if in the Premier League.
  • 20% of any profit made by Bolton Wanderers in selling the player to another club at any point in the future will be payable to West Ham.

ANTHONY STRAKER

  • Anthony Straker joined Aldershot aged 18 having been released by Crystal Palace and went on to make in the region of 200 appearances in the Conference and League Two. He rejected a new contract, and aged 22 signed for Southend United on a two year deal.
  • The PFCC decided that Southend United should pay Aldershot an initial compensation fee of £17,500.
  • Additionally, Southend United would pay an additional £5,000 if they won promotion to League One during the two year contract.
  • Southend will also pay Aldershot 20% of any profit it makes from selling the player to another club at any point in the future.

JAMES COLLINS

  • James Collins joined League Two club Shrewsbury Town as 21 year old striker in January 2011, having previously been an Aston Villa player (who made no first team appearances for Villa).
  • Quickly establishing himself as a first-team regular, James appeared 66 times in the League for Shrewsbury between 2011 and 2012, scoring 22 League goals. In the 2011/2012 season, Shrewsbury won promotion and James was their top scorer.
  • In the summer of 2012, only 18 months after signing for Shrewsbury, an out-of-contract James signed for Swindon Town, who themselves had just been promoted to League One.
  • The PFCC decided that Swindon Town should pay Shrewsbury an initial compensation fee of £140,000.
  • Additionally, further payments of £20,000 after 15, 30, 45 and 60 appearances (totalling up to £80,000) would be due.
  • Swindon would also pay Shrewsbury 20% of any profit it makes from selling the player to another club at any point in the future.

TROY ARCHIBALD-HENVILLE

  • Troy signed for Exeter City in February 2010 having previously enjoyed a successful loan spell for them (from his then parent club Tottenham Hotspur).
  • For the then League One club, Troy made 115 League appearances before his contract expired in the summer of 2012. He signed for League One club Swindon Town.
  • The PFCC ordered that Swindon should pay Exeter City an initial compensation fee of £200,000.
  • Additionally, Swindon were to pay up to £80,000 based on future appearances.
  • Swindon were also ordered to pay £40,000 if they gained promotion to the Championship whilst Troy remained an employee and £100,000 further if they gained Premier League promotion.
  • Swindon were ordered to pay Exeter 20% of any profit they made on selling the player to another club in the future.

JAMES DUNNE

  • Midfielder James Dunne joined then League One club Exeter City in the summer of 2009 after a youth career at Arsenal.
  • James appeared 110 times in the League for Exeter before the club were relegated in the summer of 2012, at the point of his contract expiry. James would sign for then League One club Stevenage.
  • The PFCC ordered that Stevenage should pay Exeter City an initial compensation fee of £75,000.
  • Additionally, Stevenage were to pay a further £25,000 after 30 and 60 appearances.
  • Stevenage were also ordered to pay to Exeter 20% of any profit they made in the event of a future sale of the player.

JED STEER

  • Jed had spent all of his youth career at Norwich City and turned professional aged 17. He made his first team debut for Norwich City in the FA Cup, away to WBA, in what would be his only first team appearance for the Canaries. He enjoyed successful loan periods at Cambridge and Yeovil Town, and played for England U16, U17 and U19. Jed was regarded by Norwich City as one of the best young goalkeepers in the country. He allowed his contract to expire and signed for Premier League club Aston Villa, immediately becoming their no.2 keeper.
  • The PFCC ordered that Aston Villa pay Norwich City an initial compensation fee of £450,000.
  • Additionally, if Jed represents England Under 21 and the full senior side, Norwich City will be paid a further £225,000.
  • Appearances for Aston Villa trigger further payments, which in total could amount to a maximum sum of £500,000.
  • Aston Villa will also need to pay Norwich 20% of any profit they make from selling the player to another club at any point in the future.

DANNY INGS

  • Danny Ings signed for Burnley as a 19 year old in the summer of 2011 after many years at Bournemouth. It was reported that Burnley had paid a transfer fee in the region of £1 million.
  • Danny appeared 122 times for Burnley in the League, scoring 38 goals, with 11 of those goals coming in the 2014/15 season in the Premier League.
  • Signing for Liverpool in the summer of 2015 as a free agent, the PFCC would ultimately order Liverpool to pay Burnley an initial compensation fee of £6.5 million.
  • Additionally, Liverpool must pay up to £1.5 million based on further appearances and also 20% of any profit they make in the event that they sell the player to another club.

CURTIS NELSON

  • Curtis had spent his schoolboy years at Stoke City but after being released at 16 he joined Plymouth Argyle’s academy in 2008.
  • In 2010 Curtis signed his first professional contract with Plymouth and between 2010 and 2016 he started 211 Football League games for them.
  • Upon his contract expiring in the summer of 2016 Curtis, then aged 23, left the League Two club to sign for League One club Oxford United.
  • The PFCC ordered that Oxford United pay Plymouth an initial compensation fee of £200,000.
  • Additionally, appearances and other factors would trigger further payments that could total another £80,000.

For more information or assistance please contact Dan Chapman. Alternatively, you can email us on info@leathesprior.co.uk or call us on 01603 610911.

Article by
Dan Chapman
November 7, 2016
Article by
Leathes Prior Team
November 7, 2016
You might also like...

The case of the fake cases: another judgment on AI-hallucinations in litigation

The use of AI Large Language Models in litigation continues to generate headlines (and consternation from the judiciary). In 2025, it seemed that rarely a month went by without a new case on fake AI-generated case law. December was no exception, and the High Court has now issued a further warning regarding the use of AI by litigants.

Chris Goodwin
15.01.2026

LP Celebrates 150th Anniversary

To begin a year of celebrations, this week Leathes Prior are delighted to reveal our refreshed brand identity and website.

Peter Lambert
05.01.2026

The Future of EOTs: Less Tax Relief, Still Strong Potential

Hugo Persad, Trainee Solicitor in our Corporate Team, summarises the impact of reduced Capital Gains Tax (“CGT”) relief on sales to Employee Ownership Trusts (“EOTs”) following the Autumn Budget.

Hugo Persad
18.12.2025

Autumn Budget 2025: Agricultural Property Relief & Business Property Relief Changes

It was announced in the 2025 Budget that from 6 April 2026, changes will be made to agricultural property relief and business property relief. These changes bring APR and BPR in line with the nil-rate band rules, meaning unused allowances can be transferred to a surviving spouse or civil partner. This is a significant step towards making estate planning easier for families who own farms or businesses.

Claire Woolliscroft TEP
18.12.2025

More industry insights

Stay informed with our latest legal insights.

View All

The case of the fake cases: another judgment on AI-hallucinations in litigation

The use of AI Large Language Models in litigation continues to generate headlines (and consternation from the judiciary). In 2025, it seemed that rarely a month went by without a new case on fake AI-generated case law. December was no exception, and the High Court has now issued a further warning regarding the use of AI by litigants.

Chris Goodwin
15.01.2026

LP Celebrates 150th Anniversary

To begin a year of celebrations, this week Leathes Prior are delighted to reveal our refreshed brand identity and website.

Peter Lambert
05.01.2026

The Future of EOTs: Less Tax Relief, Still Strong Potential

Hugo Persad, Trainee Solicitor in our Corporate Team, summarises the impact of reduced Capital Gains Tax (“CGT”) relief on sales to Employee Ownership Trusts (“EOTs”) following the Autumn Budget.

Hugo Persad
18.12.2025

Autumn Budget 2025: Agricultural Property Relief & Business Property Relief Changes

It was announced in the 2025 Budget that from 6 April 2026, changes will be made to agricultural property relief and business property relief. These changes bring APR and BPR in line with the nil-rate band rules, meaning unused allowances can be transferred to a surviving spouse or civil partner. This is a significant step towards making estate planning easier for families who own farms or businesses.

Claire Woolliscroft TEP
18.12.2025

The Employment Rights Act 2025 is expected to come into force tomorrow (18 December 2025)

After an extended period of back-and-forth amendments between Parliament and the House of Lords, on 16 December 2025, the ERB finally received approval from the House of Lords, with the formality of Royal Assent due to take place tomorrow (18 December 2025). Head of LP Employment, Dan Chapman, explains...

Dan Chapman
17.12.2025

Charity of the Month: The Matthew Project

Leathes Prior is delighted to be supporting The Matthew Project as our Charity of the Month for December 2025. The Matthew Project supports young people and adults across Norfolk, Suffolk, and Essex to overcome issues around drugs, alcohol, and mental health, empowering them to rebuild confidence and lead fulfilling lives.

Rhiannon Bond
10.12.2025

Leathes Prior’s Milan Pandit appointed President of the Norfolk & Norwich Law Society

Leathes Prior Solicitors is proud to announce that Milan Pandit, Solicitor in our Corporate & Commercial Team, has been appointed President of the Norfolk & Norwich Law Society (NNLS) for 2025/26.

Peter Lambert
04.12.2025

Leathes Prior advises Mapus-Smith & Lemmon LLP on the acquisition Kathryn Gigg Chartered Accountants

Leathes Prior’s Corporate Team has advised Mapus-Smith & Lemmon LLP on the acquisition of Kathryn Gigg Chartered Accountants, Business Advisors & Tax Consultants.

Peter Lambert
03.12.2025

The Autumn Budget 2025: A Summary

Lucy Matthews, Solicitor in our Commercial Team summarises the Autumn Budget 2025 presented by Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves.

Lucy Matthews
26.11.2025

Commercial Lease Renewals: A guide for Landlords & Tenants

Commercial lease renewals are a topic that every commercial landlord and business that rents commercial premises should have at the forefront of their minds. It is essential for good succession planning, though it is often neglected until the expiry of an existing lease term is looming or once the existing term has come to an end and the tenant is holding over. In this article, our newly qualified solicitor, Maggie Berry explores the process that landlords and tenants can expect when navigating this complex area of law.

Maggie Berry
24.11.2025

Our Guidance, Your Legacy: What is a Will, and why should I make one?

Not only is a Will one of the most important steps you can take to protect your loved ones and ensure your wishes are respected, but it also limits the likelihood of a claim/dispute following your death. To ensure your loved ones and the causes you care about benefit from your estate, a Will is essential to ensuring this happens. Find out more in this article.

Ejike Ndaji
24.11.2025

Lease extensions: The essentials to getting started

Extending your lease can seem complex, but taking the right steps early can make the process much smoother. Jake Mowatt, Associate and Harry Smith, Trainee Solicitor in our Residential Property Team outlines the key essentials every leaseholder should understand prior to extending their lease.

Jake Mowatt
14.11.2025

Leathes Prior acted for Hatfield Investments Limited on the sale of Crossways Residential Home

Leathes Prior's Corporate, Commercial Property & Employment Teams acted for Hatfield Investments Limited on the sale of Crossways Residential Home.

Peter Lambert
13.11.2025

Leathes Prior assists Greenhaul Limited with sale to Ascent Acquisitions Limited

Leathes Prior’s Corporate Team has advised the shareholders of Greenhaul Limited, a family-owned Norfolk transport business, on its sale to Ascent Acquisitions Limited.

Peter Lambert
13.11.2025

Upcoming changes to bringing employment law claims: What these mean for you

The highly anticipated Employment Rights Bill (ERB) is set to increase the time limits in which employees can bring an employment tribunal claim. Gareth Stevens & Rose Woolterton explain what this means for employers & employees.

Gareth Stevens
12.11.2025

Charity of the Month: The Benjamin Foundation

Leathes Prior is thrilled to be supporting The Benjamin Foundation as our Charity of the Month and participating in Sleep Out 2025 this month.

Jess Bullimore
12.11.2025

Service Charges in Residential Leases: FAQs

Service charges are forever a hot topic in the world of property disputes, and it remains one of the most contentious areas between freeholders and leaseholders, particularly in long residential leases. Danny Turpin, Associate, discusses frequently asked questions regarding service charges on long residential leases.

Danny Turpin
31.10.2025

Property Disputes Team helps local landlords

The Leathes Prior Property Disputes Team advises a local landlord on forfeiture in respect of two of its units and a residential landlord on a complex residential possession claim.

Peter Lambert
27.10.2025

Our Charity of the Month: Norfolk and Waveney Mind

With today being World Mental Health Day, Leathes Prior is pleased to be supporting Norfolk and Waveney Mind as our Charity of the Month for October 2025.

Rhiannon Bond
10.10.2025

Leathes Prior winners in nine categories in the prestigious Legal 500 Future Laywer Survey

We are thrilled to announce that the firm has placed once again in the Legal 500 Future Lawyer survey as No.1 in the UK for our Social Life; a ranking we have held in the survey for seven years out of the past nine years.

Jess Bullimore
03.10.2025

Leathes Prior advises Phoenix Support Ltd on EOT structure

Leathes Prior is delighted to have advised Phoenix Support Limited on its transition to an employee-owned business under an Employee Ownership Trust (EOT) structure.

Peter Lambert
29.09.2025

Jess’s Rule – New Guidelines for GPs

A new initiative is being rolled out across GP practices across England in the hope of preventing serious illnesses being missed by GPs where patients present with the same, or deteriorating, symptoms on multiple occasions. Kimberley Nelson in our Personal Injury & Clinical Negligence Team discusses new guidelines for GPs.

Kimberley Nelson
23.09.2025

Our Charity of the Month: The Feed

Leathes Prior is delighted to be supporting The Feed as our Charity of the Month for September 2025. Founded in 2014, The Feed is a Norwich-based charity dedicated to helping our local community to eat well, live well, and feel connected.

Rhiannon Bond
19.09.2025

Leathes Prior expands Employment Team with key appointment

Leathes Prior is delighted to announce the further expansion of our Employment Team with the appointment of Daniel Hughes as a Solicitor.

Peter Lambert
18.09.2025

Leathes Prior are excited to announce that four Trainee Solicitors qualify at the firm

Leathes Prior is excited to announce that four of our amazing trainees, Eleanor Chapman, Maggie Berry, Alex Robinson, and Georgia Sartin, have successfully completed their training contracts and are now qualifying as Solicitors at the firm.

Peter Lambert
15.09.2025

Get in Touch

By clicking submit, you agree to our Privacy Policy

Submit
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.