Employment for employees

Leathes Prior’s Employment Team has long been regarded as one of the leading employment law teams in East Anglia and beyond, providing expert advice on all aspects of employment law.
Our employment lawyers acts for individuals across the UK, whether you’re facing a workplace dispute or simply would like some advice, the team prides themselves on providing tailored and compassionate advice to the specific requirements of the client, whilst offering support and guidance throughout the matter.
Each employee is unique but the team’s decades of experience, technical expertise and commercial awareness ensures an exceptional service is provided. With an enviable track record in the Employment Tribunal over many years, the team represent clients fearlessly if litigation becomes necessary.
The team has expertise in all areas of contentious and non-contentious employment work including:
Termination of Employment
Maternity & Paternity Rights
Settlement Agreements
Unfair & Wrongful Dismissal
Employment Disputes, Litigation, & Tribunal Representation
Advocacy Services
Discrimination, Bullying, & Harrassment
Disciplinary & Grievance Advice
Redundancies & Restructuring
Restrictive Covenants & Injunctions

Make an Enquiry
Reported Cases
Our Employment Team's reported cases include:
Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment of Judge Auerbach on 28 February 2025.
Heard at: Watford Employment Tribunal by video (CVP)
On: 10 December 2024 and 11 December 2024
Before: Employment Judge Macey
Representation Claimant: Mr Redpath, counsel
Respondent: Mr Chapman, solicitor
Held at: Manchester
On: 19 September 2017
Before: Employment Judge Sherratt
Representation Claimant: Mr J Jenkins, Counsel
1st Respondent: Mr Chapman, Advocate
2nd Respondent: Ms J Hale, Solicitor
Heard at: London Central
On: 20 November 2017
Before: Regional Employment Judge Potter
Representation Claimant: Ms E George, Counsel
Respondent: Mr D Chapman, Solicitor
Heard at: Norwich ET
On: 3rd & 4th July 2017
Before: Employment Judge Cassel
Respresentation For the Claimant: Mr S Kemp, Husband of the Claimant
For the Respondent: Mr D Chapman, Solicitor
At the Tribunal
On 25 May 2011
Judgment handed down on 31 August 2011
At the Tribunal
On 12 August 2014
Handed down on 14 November 14
Heard at: Bury St Edmunds
On: 19 to 22 November 2018
Before: Employment Judge Finlay
Members: Mr R Allan and Mr V Brazkiewicz
Appearances
For the claimant: Mr D Chapman (Solicitor)
For the respondent: Mr M Foster (Solicitor)
Heard at: Nottingham Employment Tribunal (by remote CVP)
On: 21 and 22 July 2021
Before: Employment Judge K Welch (sitting alone)
Representation
Claimant: In Person
Respondent: Mr D Chapman, Solicitor
Employment Tribunal decision
Heard at: Bury St Edmunds Employment Tribunal
On: 25th September 2019
Before: Employment Judge King
Appearances
For the Claimant: Did not attend
For the Respondent: Mr D Chapman (solicitor)
The Claimant applied for interim relief pursuant to s.128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 following the termination of his contract allegedly because he had made protected disclosures. The Respondent contended that there was no entitlement to make such an application as the Claimant was not an "employee" within the meaning of that section. The Respondent's application for a postponement of the interim relief application pending a determination of the employee issue was refused. At the interim relief hearing, the Tribunal considered that the "likely to succeed" test under s.129 of the 1996 Act applied not just to the reason for dismissal but also to the contested issue of employee status. It determined that the Claimant had a 'pretty good chance' of success in showing that he was an employee and that he was dismissed for having made protected disclosures. The Respondent appealed on the grounds that the Tribunal erred in entertaining the application for interim relief before first concluding that the Claimant was indeed an employee.
What our clients say

.png)







































