Liquidators gonna liquidate (but they can’t adjudicate)
Lonsdale v Bresco
.jpg)

Historically, it has been a relatively common practice for liquidators for companies involved in construction contracts to adjudicate any dispute and then, if successful, sell on the claim to a third party to enforce.
Michael J Lonsdale (Electrical) Limited entered into a contract with Bresco Electrical Services Limited on 21 August 2014 for electrical installation works at a property at St James Square, London. Bresco was to provide the work in return for payment of £360,000.
Poor old Bresco went into liquidation on 12 March 2015. Bresco claimed payment of circa £200,000 for work carried out (amongst other things). Lonsdale disagreed. Bresco’s liquidators therefore commenced adjudication proceedings (which is the dispute resolution procedure for the construction industry). Lonsdale asked the court to determine whether the liquidators could do so.
The judge (Mr Justice Fraser) quite rightly interpreted the insolvency rules and found that they could not do so. When a liquidator is appointed, Rule 14.25 of the Insolvency Rules says that an account is taken of all debts, which includes (broadly) a set-off in respect of their “mutual dealings”. Therefore any money that remains owing is owed in accordance with the Insolvency Rules, not in accordance with a construction contract. That means that the claim is not covered by the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
So Insolvency Practitioners cannot refer money claims to adjudication. Or, rather, if they do the decision will be unenforceable at court.
There may still be a place for adjudication in insolvency proceedings. The company in liquidation could refer a question arising under the construction contract, rather than a money claim. A party is entitled to refer a dispute “at any time”, which will no doubt be the subject of future proceedings soon. Moreover, this decision only applies to statutory adjudication; it is not clear whether contractual adjudication would produce the same effect, particularly if the adjudication clause were very carefully drafted.


Updates to auto-renewing subscriptions: What can businesses do to prepare?
Lucy Matthews & Harry Smith in our Corporate & Commercial Team share an update on the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (“DMCC Act”) and the introduction of a new regime for consumer subscription contracts due to take effect in Spring 2027.



Uncorking Change: Current Legal Trends Shaping UK Viticulture
Viticulture is now widely recognised as one of the UK’s fastest growing agricultural sectors, supported by investment, climate change and consumer demand. Against that backdrop, the legal landscape is evolving quickly, and vineyards, investors and rural estates must keep pace with a combination of regulatory reform, environmental changes and labour pressures which are materially shaping how vineyards are established and operated. Rebecca Allen, Senior Associate in our Agriculture Team discusses the evolution of viticulture in the UK.



EPCs for Non-Domestic Property: The Latest Changes
The UK Government has announced a significant change to its proposed approach to energy efficiency standards for non-domestic property in England and Wales. For owners, investors and occupiers of commercial property, this is one of the most important developments in the EPC regime since the introduction of MEES. Rebecca Millard, Senior Associate in our Commercial Property Team explains...










.jpg)











%20cropped.jpg)







.jpg)

%20website.jpg)

.jpg)



