Liquidators gonna liquidate (but they can’t adjudicate)
Lonsdale v Bresco
.jpg)

Historically, it has been a relatively common practice for liquidators for companies involved in construction contracts to adjudicate any dispute and then, if successful, sell on the claim to a third party to enforce.
Michael J Lonsdale (Electrical) Limited entered into a contract with Bresco Electrical Services Limited on 21 August 2014 for electrical installation works at a property at St James Square, London. Bresco was to provide the work in return for payment of £360,000.
Poor old Bresco went into liquidation on 12 March 2015. Bresco claimed payment of circa £200,000 for work carried out (amongst other things). Lonsdale disagreed. Bresco’s liquidators therefore commenced adjudication proceedings (which is the dispute resolution procedure for the construction industry). Lonsdale asked the court to determine whether the liquidators could do so.
The judge (Mr Justice Fraser) quite rightly interpreted the insolvency rules and found that they could not do so. When a liquidator is appointed, Rule 14.25 of the Insolvency Rules says that an account is taken of all debts, which includes (broadly) a set-off in respect of their “mutual dealings”. Therefore any money that remains owing is owed in accordance with the Insolvency Rules, not in accordance with a construction contract. That means that the claim is not covered by the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
So Insolvency Practitioners cannot refer money claims to adjudication. Or, rather, if they do the decision will be unenforceable at court.
There may still be a place for adjudication in insolvency proceedings. The company in liquidation could refer a question arising under the construction contract, rather than a money claim. A party is entitled to refer a dispute “at any time”, which will no doubt be the subject of future proceedings soon. Moreover, this decision only applies to statutory adjudication; it is not clear whether contractual adjudication would produce the same effect, particularly if the adjudication clause were very carefully drafted.


Changes to qualifying period: Time to rethink probation periods?
From 1 January 2027, the qualifying period is reducing from two years to six months. But the reality is that the new law will apply to all employees who have already accumulated at least six months of continuous employment by this date. This means that now is the right time for employers to be reviewing their employment contracts and rethinking strategies on probationary periods.



Proposals for reform of cohabitation rights on the death of a cohabitating partner
Georgia Sartin, a Solicitor in our Property and Contentious Probate Team explores the government’s recent open consultation ‘a fairer end to relationships’ published on 5 June 2026, , in respect of the proposals for reform for cohabitants in the intestacy framework and 1975 Act claims.








%20cropped.jpg)

.jpg)









.jpg)

%20website.jpg)

.jpg)




%20cropped.jpg)

-3.jpg)


.jpg)



