Liquidators gonna liquidate (but they can’t adjudicate)
Lonsdale v Bresco
.jpg)

Historically, it has been a relatively common practice for liquidators for companies involved in construction contracts to adjudicate any dispute and then, if successful, sell on the claim to a third party to enforce.
Michael J Lonsdale (Electrical) Limited entered into a contract with Bresco Electrical Services Limited on 21 August 2014 for electrical installation works at a property at St James Square, London. Bresco was to provide the work in return for payment of £360,000.
Poor old Bresco went into liquidation on 12 March 2015. Bresco claimed payment of circa £200,000 for work carried out (amongst other things). Lonsdale disagreed. Bresco’s liquidators therefore commenced adjudication proceedings (which is the dispute resolution procedure for the construction industry). Lonsdale asked the court to determine whether the liquidators could do so.
The judge (Mr Justice Fraser) quite rightly interpreted the insolvency rules and found that they could not do so. When a liquidator is appointed, Rule 14.25 of the Insolvency Rules says that an account is taken of all debts, which includes (broadly) a set-off in respect of their “mutual dealings”. Therefore any money that remains owing is owed in accordance with the Insolvency Rules, not in accordance with a construction contract. That means that the claim is not covered by the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
So Insolvency Practitioners cannot refer money claims to adjudication. Or, rather, if they do the decision will be unenforceable at court.
There may still be a place for adjudication in insolvency proceedings. The company in liquidation could refer a question arising under the construction contract, rather than a money claim. A party is entitled to refer a dispute “at any time”, which will no doubt be the subject of future proceedings soon. Moreover, this decision only applies to statutory adjudication; it is not clear whether contractual adjudication would produce the same effect, particularly if the adjudication clause were very carefully drafted.


Charity of the Month: Sue Lambert Trust
Leathes Prior is delighted to be supporting the Sue Lambert Trust as our Charity of the Month for February 2026. Sue Lambert Trust is a leading charity in Norfolk offering free therapeutic counselling and support services to survivors of sexual violence and abuse.



Supreme Court ruling set to impact NHS - Children injured by NHS can claim damages for lifetime lost earnings
In February 2026, the Supreme Court passed a ruling which is set to significantly increase the amount of damages the NHS may have to pay for claims brought in respect of children injured at birth, as a result of medical negligence.

.jpg)

The Value of Planning Ahead: LPAs & Court of Protection
Putting LPAs in place allows you to choose trusted people to make decisions for you if you lose capacity in the future. This avoids the need for loved ones to make a costly and time-consuming deputyship application to the Court of Protection. With more people likely to experience conditions affecting capacity, more families may need to turn to the Court for support where no LPAs are in place.



















.jpg)













